Limit of Functions
We have a precise definition of \(\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n = L\) for a sequence. The idea behind \(\lim_{x\to c} f(x) = L\) is analogous: \(f(x)\) gets arbitrarily close to \(L\) whenever \(x\) is chosen close enough (but not equal) to \(c\).
Recall the \(\varepsilon\)–\(N\) definition of limit: for every \(\varepsilon > 0\), there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that whenever \(n \ge N\),
\(|a_n-L|<\varepsilon\)
For functional limits, the challenge is still an \(\varepsilon\)-neighborhood around \(L\), but the response is a \(\delta\)-neighborhood around \(c\).
Let \(f: A \to \mathbb{R}\), and let \(c\) be a limit point of the domain \(A\). We say \(\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L\) provided that, for all \(\varepsilon > 0\), there exists \(\delta > 0\) such that whenever
\(0 < |x - c| < \delta\) and \(x \in A\) implies \(|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon\)
Reading the picture: The challenge is any \(\varepsilon > 0\) (horizontal band around \(L\)). The response is a \(\delta > 0\) (vertical strip around \(c\)). The definition says: the entire portion of the graph inside the vertical strip (excluding \(x=c\)) must lie inside the horizontal band.
Let \(c\) be a limit point of the domain of \(f: A \to \mathbb{R}\). We say \(\lim_{x\to c} f(x) = L\) provided that, for every \(\varepsilon\)-neighborhood \(V_\varepsilon(L)\) of \(L\), there exists a \(\delta\)-neighborhood \(V_\delta(c)\) such that for all \(x \in V_\delta(c)\) with \(x \neq c\) and \(x \in A\):
\(f(x) \in V_\varepsilon(L)\)
Scratch work:
Formal proof:
Scratch work:
Formal proof:
Given \(f: A \to \mathbb{R}\) and a limit point \(c\) of \(A\), the following are equivalent:
Assume \(\lim_{x\to c} f(x) = L\). Let \((x_n) \to c\) with \(x_n \neq c\).
Assume \(\lim_{x\to c} f(x) \neq L\).
For each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), apply the negation above with \(\delta = \frac{1}{n}\) to obtain \(x_n\) with
\(0 < |x_n - c| < \frac{1}{n}\) and \(|f(x_n) - L| \geq \varepsilon_0\)
Let \(f: A \to \mathbb{R}\) and \(c\) a limit point of \(A\). If there exist sequences \((x_n)\) and \((y_n)\) in \(A\) with \(x_n \neq c\), \(y_n \neq c\), and
\(\lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} y_n = c\) but \(\lim_{n \to \infty} f(x_n) \neq \lim_{n \to \infty} f(y_n)\),
then \(\lim_{x\to c} f(x)\) does not exist.
The function oscillates rapidly near \(0\).
Take \(x_n = \) and \(y_n = \)
Checklist:
Show that \(x_n \to 0\) and \(y_n \to 0\).
Check \(\sin(1/x_n) \neq \sin(1/y_n)\).
Since \(\lim \sin(1/x_n) = 0 \neq 1 = \lim \sin(1/y_n)\), the limit does not exist. \(\blacksquare\)
Just as we built up arithmetic for sequences, the Sequential Criterion lets us inherit the results immediately:
Assume \(\lim_{x\to c} f(x) = L\) and \(\lim_{x\to c} g(x) = M\). Then: