Consequences of Completeness (Part 2)
In the previous handout, we established the Archimedean Property and the Nested Interval Property as consequences of the Axiom of Completeness. In this handout, we focus on two further consequences that highlight approximation and existence in $\mathbb{R}$.
Theorem: Density of $\mathbb{Q}$
For any two real numbers $a $$a < r < b.$$
No matter how close two real numbers are, we can always find a rational number strictly between them. This says that $\mathbb{Q}$ has no gaps inside $\mathbb{R}$.
Step 1: Choose a large enough $n$
Because $a.
By the Archimedean Property, there exists $n\in\mathbb{N}$ such that
$$\frac{1}{n} < b-a.$$Step 2: Find an integer $m$ between $na$ and $nb$
Multiply the inequality $\frac{1}{n} Expanding: $na < na + 1 < nb$ (since $1 < n(b-a)$). Define the set: From the previous handout, the set $S$ has a greatest lower bound (infimum) in $\mathbb{R}$. Let $m$ be the minimum (smallest integer) of $S$. Step 3: Define the rational number Define Explain why $r$ is a rational number: Step 4: Show $a < r < b$ From the definition of $m$, we have $na < m$. Dividing by $n$, conclude that Use the minimality of $m$ to show that $m \le na+1$. Hint: What can you say about $m-1$? Is it in $S$? Divide by $n$ and use Step 1 to conclude Therefore, $a < r < b$. $\square$ This is the moment we've been waiting for! We can now prove that $\sqrt{2}$ exists—the fifth item on our "Wish List". There exists a real number $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $\alpha^2=2$. We denote this number by $\alpha=\sqrt{2}$ (or $2^{1/2}$). Define the set Explain why the set $S$ is nonempty and bounded above: Therefore by Axiom 3, the set $S$ has a in $\mathbb{R}$, call it $x \in \mathbb{R}$. Explain why $x>1$: Since the real numbers satisfy the Trichotomy Law, exactly one of the following must hold: The strategy is to show that $x^2=2$ by ruling out the other two possibilities. Case 1: Assume $x^2 < 2$ Our goal is to find a number slightly larger than $x$ that still belongs to $S$. Explain why finding such a number would contradict the fact that $x = \sup S$: Consider: Show that: $\left(x + \frac{1}{n}\right)^2 \le x^2 + \frac{1}{n}(2x+1)$. We want: $\left(x + \frac{1}{n}\right)^2 < 2$. This will happen provided By the Archimedean Property, choose $n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\frac{1}{n}$ is sufficiently small. Then $x + \frac{1}{n} \in S$, which contradicts that $x = \sup S$. Therefore, we cannot have $x^2 < 2$. Case 2: Assume $x^2 > 2$ This time, we try to find a number slightly smaller than $x$ that is still an upper bound for $S$. Explain why this would contradict the definition of supremum: By the Archimedean Property, choose $m \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\left(x - \frac{1}{m}\right)^2 > 2$. Then $x - \frac{1}{m}$ is an upper bound for $S$ smaller than $x$, contradicting $x = \sup S$. Therefore, we cannot have $x^2 > 2$. Conclusion Since both $x^2 < 2$ and $x^2 > 2$ lead to contradictions, we conclude There exists an irrational number. (For example, $\sqrt{2}$ is irrational.) Modify the argument above to show that there exists a positive real number $y$ such that $y^2=3$.Verification
Verification
Verification
Theorem: Existence of $\sqrt{2}$
Verification
Verification
Contradiction
Show
Contradiction
Corollary
Activity
← Back to MATH 4630